Lemon Law Attorney
Filtering fact from fiction
|
|
Dear Tom and Ray: My son was driving his 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse on the highway when the engine failed catastrophically. The oil filter blew off, and oil spewed all over the highway. He had it towed to the nearest dealer, who insists it should not be covered under warranty because my son “ran it out of oil.” My son has serviced the car at two dealerships. The last oil change was at 31,000 miles, and it now has 37,900. He filed a complaint with Mitsubishi’s headquarters, but they are sticking by the dealer. How can they claim it ran out of oil, when oil was all over the highway and under the car? Do we have any recourse? He still owes megabucks on this now engineless car. - Charlotte Tom: Well, the circumstantial evidence seems to be in your favor, Charlotte. But I assume the dealer is claiming that the oil filter slowly came loose, dripped a little bit of oil each day, and your son was negligent for not checking the oil level and noticing that it was low. Then, finally, when the filter fell off entirely on the highway, the small amount of remaining oil spilled out. That’s the dealer’s story. Ray: And you and your son obviously believe that the oil filter was not loose, and that it simply blew off catastrophically, causing the engine to seize. Tom: There’s only one good way to find out. You have to examine the oil filter. If the oil filter looks normal, as if it did just “fall off,” then you’ll be hard pressed to collect from Mitsu-bishi. Even if you go back to the dealership that did the last oil change, I’m sure it’d be reluctant to accept the blame for a loose filter that was installed 7,000 miles ago. They’ll argue - and reasonably so - that if they had left it loose, it probably would have fallen off 6,500 miles ago. Ray: But if the filter did, in fact, “blow apart,” it’ll be visibly damaged. Any good mechanic can look at it and tell you whether it fell off or blew apart. If the filter did blow apart, it would have to be due to excessive engine oil pressure. And that would clearly be a manufacturing problem that should be covered under warranty. Tom: So, if an independent mechanic can confirm that the filter “blew apart,” then it’s definitely worth going to court. If you go to our Web site, the Car Talk section of www.cars.com, you’ll find a “Lemon Law” area. While this is not a lemon-law case, under “contact info” you should find a link to your state’s bar association. Get in touch with it and ask for a referral to a lawyer who specializes in automotive cases. And good luck, Charlotte. |
Related Articles from Attorney for Lemon Law
Analysts caution used-car buyers to make sure certified label is justified.
Certified used car programs may be good for consumers unable to afford new vehicles, but analysts caution buyers about being misled into paying too much money for a car with concealed flaws. While they have yet to hit Pennsylvania, such complaints are filtering in from other parts of the country, including allegations that cars are being sold that don't merit the certified label and that warranty coverage offered by independent firms is inferior to what manufacturers will provide. A lawsuit has been filed against Ford Motor Co. and a California dealership, claiming misleading advertising and unfair pricing. And another suit
Feedback System on Ebay Motors a Farce
I bought a car from Pro Auto Group, a Fort Worth-based dealership, through Ebay Motors. The car was “certified” to be free of mechanical defect. Within HOURS of leaving the dealership with the car, the clutch/transmission failed and the car had to be towed to a repair shop. In short, despite attempts at mediation and direct negotiations, Pro Auto Group refused to do a thing to repair the car or take it back for a refund. Their position was that the damage was due to “driver abuse” despite the fact that I had the car for less than 6 hours
Damaged frame? Time to talk to the manager
QUESTION: I had my car appraised for sale and was given a written quote that stated the car has a damaged frame. I bought the car new in 2000, when it had 44 miles on the odometer, and was not told about an accident prior to purchase. The car has not been in an accident since then, which means it had to have been damaged and repaired while at the dealership. The dealership cannot sell my car on its lot because of the frame damage. Other than that, the car is in perfect condition, but the damage took quite a
Audi A-6 Quattro Owners Left Stranded on the Road
The law firms of Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. and Monheit, Monheit, Silverman & Fodera, P.C. have filed a class action suit against Audi of America, Inc. and its parent company, Volkswagen of America, Inc., alleging fuel gauge malfunctions in certain 1998, 1999, and 2000 Audi Quattro models. According to court papers filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, many Audi Quattro owners have found their cars running out of gas despite the fact that their fuel gauge...
Lemon Law ruling squeezes buyers
If the car you buy or lease is a lemon, you’d better hang onto it — at least until you get to sue the manufacturer. In a unanimous decision Wednesday, the Arizona Court of Appeals blocked efforts by a Mesa couple to sue DaimlerChrysler Corp. over problems they were having with the Dodge Ram truck they leased from a Globe dealership. The judges said once the couple disposed of the truck, they lost all rights under the state’s Lemon Law. Attorney Marshall Meyers, who represents Travis and Shelly Hull, said an appeal is likely. He said the fact that they sold